你的逻辑就是你不会就没人这么干？
1 Like
针对耽美文学则不会，对吗？因为耽美文学是女性幻想男男恋爱，这里没有犯罪空间
1 Like
别扯你那损害，别扯你那损害，别扯你那损害
淫秽的定义是其本身特征，不是造成损害
我反对淫秽不需要以其损害我为由
2 Likes
有淫秽内容就有性关系方面的。之前一直忘了一点的还有对于未成年人认知的损害。
1 Like
The user wants a concise summary of the potential negative impacts of obscene danmei literature, focusing on objective points and avoiding conversational filler. My thought process to generate this summary involves:
-
Filtering for “Obscene Danmei”: The key constraint is “obscene.” This immediately excludes positive aspects of danmei and focuses on the potentially harmful content.
-
Recalling Previous Discussions: I access my memory of the conversation, specifically looking for points related to negative impacts, harm, or concerns about danmei, especially when labeled as “obscene.”
-
Categorizing Potential Harms: I group the identified negative impacts into logical categories:
- Impact on Minors (even if not the target audience): Access to inappropriate content.
- Distorted Views on Sexuality and Relationships: Unrealistic portrayals, potentially unhealthy dynamics.
- Normalization of Harmful Content: Depictions of non-consensual acts, etc.
- Potential for Exploitation (even if indirect): The commercial aspect of creating and distributing obscene material.
- Legal Ramifications: The fact that it violates existing laws.
-
Formulating Concise Bullet Points: For each category, I create a brief, impactful statement. I avoid jargon and focus on clear, understandable language.
-
Focusing on Potential and Risk: I use cautious language like “can,” “potential,” “may” because I’m discussing potential harms, not guaranteed outcomes.
-
Avoiding Moralizing Language (as requested): I aim for a neutral tone, focusing on the potential negative effects rather than making moral judgments about the content itself.
-
Excluding Redundant or Less Relevant Points: I omit points that are less directly related to the negative impacts of obscene content, such as arguments about censorship, artistic merit, or comparisons to other genres.
-
Reviewing for Clarity and Accuracy: I ensure the summary is accurate, concise, and directly addresses the user’s prompt. I check for any potential ambiguities or misinterpretations.好的，根据之前的对话，关于淫秽的耽美文学可能造成的不良影响，可以总结为以下几点：
- 可能对心智未成熟的未成年人产生误导，造成性启蒙偏差，对性、爱情和人际关系产生不切实际或不健康的认知。
- 可能扭曲部分读者对男性形象和男性气质的理解，加剧刻板印象，或对现实中的男性产生不合理的期待。
- 部分作品中可能包含不健康或具有剥削性质的内容，例如非自愿性行为、虐待等，长期接触可能潜移默化地影响读者的价值观。
- 从法律角度而言，制作和传播淫秽物品本身就是违法行为，可能导致法律风险。
- 可能引发社会伦理道德争议，冲击社会主流价值观。
- 如果内容涉及未成年人，则可能触犯更严格的法律，对未成年人造成实际伤害。
1 Like
这东西在公共平台上嘛？都说了已经扔到台湾那边了，好嘛
1 Like
这东西只在台湾网站上有？
我在视频号都看见好几次这种sb小说引流的了……
1 Like
油管不是公共平台？和在哪有关系吗
原来只有国内的是公共平台了
1 Like
所以你认为有什么东西不造成损害，仅仅存在就是不正当的？凭什么呢？
1 Like
AI给你回答了，你倒是看啊 
1 Like
你在视频网站上能看到的肯定不淫秽
1 Like
油管是小说网站？我们在谈论耽美文学
1 Like
反对的是淫秽小说知道吗，
正常的耽美在中国能看、能公开的看
1 Like
你先别怼了，你是来怼人的还是讨论事实的？有论证了你又不看。真就专注于抬杠是吧。
1 Like
又切割，说的不是公共平台吗
而且说的是淫秽不是耽美，别捧着你耽美了行吗
就非要把耽美和淫秽切割开，不可能的
1 Like
经典非对称竞技只能说
又开始1v3了
1 Like
我相信我在一开始就对AI做出的这几个回答有过回应？
1 Like
你的回应就是一直追问“这玩意儿到底哪儿有害了？”？？
1 Like
我怎么感觉人身攻击一般就是用在这种时候的呢、
1 Like