没有器官就死
正好减少老龄化
贩卖器官这种泯灭人性的生意绝对不能合法化
还有死刑犯是人也有人权
器官是自己自己有权决定捐不捐
花钱买命倒是很尊重人的选择权。以及中国上层是绝对不信神的。
The text you provided discusses the practices of organ donation and execution of death row inmates in Taiwan. Here’s a summary of the key points:
Taiwanese Death Penalty Execution:
- Taiwan uses lethal injection or shooting for executions, but practically, shooting is the standard method.
- A single officer typically carries out the execution.
- A sedative may be used before execution.
- If the prisoner is not donating organs, the officer shoots at the heart.
- If the prisoner is donating organs, the officer shoots at the head.
Organ Donation from Death Row Inmates:
- Organ donation from death row inmates is a contentious issue.
- Some inmates want to donate to show remorse and contribute to society.
- There are concerns whether the donation is truly voluntary or influenced by family compensation or moral pressure.
- International human rights groups and transplant communities oppose organ donation from death row inmates.
- The standard for brain death declaration usually requires a 12-hour observation period.
- In Taiwan, an inmate who has been shot in the head is declared dead for legal purposes only 20 minutes post-shot if they are an organ donor.
- This timing conflicts with medical consensus.
- The Ministry of Health and Welfare is revising relevant laws.
General Medical/Legal Consensus:
- Voluntary Consent: Organ donation should be based on true voluntary consent, and the individual should be free from coercion or undue influence.
- Brain Death Criteria: Medical standards for brain death must be strictly followed and should not be rushed for organ harvesting. There needs to be a sufficient observation period to ensure brain death has occurred.
- Ethical Concerns: There are ethical issues with taking organs from death row inmates, particularly regarding voluntariness, as well as the perceived possibility of using it as a method of state-sanctioned punishment.
- Global Opposition: International human rights groups and the transplant communities generally do not support the taking of organs from death row inmates.
- Respect for Human Rights: Regardless of their crimes, prisoners are entitled to basic human rights, which include bodily autonomy and respect, even after death.
- Transparency: Transparency in the process of organ retrieval, allocation, and distribution is key to building trust in the system and preventing corruption.
Points to Consider:
- The text mentions a concern that death row organ donation in Taiwan can violate the medical definition of death and existing medical consensus.
- The discussion of other countries also highlights the ethical concerns related to harvesting organs from prisoners.
- There’s an ongoing debate about whether a dead person should have the right to donate organs or whether that right should fall to the family. This could potentially reduce the amount of organ donation.
Essentially, the consensus is moving away from using death row organs due to the ethical concerns involved and the need for a transparent, voluntary system.
说中文
花钱买命是对所谓卖命者的剥削，也会产生被自愿的现象
1 Like
不信神何以見得
从这个角度来看整个资本主义都是如此，血汗工厂难道不是另一种花钱买命吗？
难道人权在表面上可以买卖吗
字面意义，体制内中高层有宗教信仰和贪污被认为是差不多的
剥削是分级分类的，如器官剥削，性剥削，不能不分轻重混为一谈
2 Likes
真信邪教也不會廣而告之啊寶貝
別太單純
穷国的一些工厂对工人健康的损害丝毫不弱于摘一个肾
高层可能不完全会按马主义行事，但无神论这点相信他们还是赞同的
黑工厂当然也是侵犯人权，在比烂吗
那也不代表就可以光明正大的摘走别人的器官
技术官僚和信仰天生不兼容。以科学的方式看待一切必然会损害一切宗教的合法性。
上层基本都有理工系学位，邪教一般只能骗一骗傻子
只能说李商隐遥遥领先
你提供的文本讨论了台湾关于死刑犯器官捐献和执行死刑的做法，以下是主要内容的总结：
台湾的死刑执行方式：
- 台湾执行死刑的方式有药物注射和枪毙，但实际上主要使用枪毙。
- 通常由一名法警执行。
- 执行前可能会使用镇静剂。
- 如果死囚不捐献器官，法警会朝心脏射击；如果捐献，则朝头部射击。
死刑犯的器官捐献：
- 死刑犯器官捐献是一个有争议的问题。
- 有些死囚希望通过捐献器官来表达悔过并回馈社会。
- 但人们质疑这些死囚是否真的在“自愿”的情况下选择捐献，还是为了让家人得到补偿或受到社会道德压力。
- 国际人权组织和移植医学界都不赞成死刑犯器官捐献。
- 脑死亡的判定标准通常需要至少12小时的观察期。
- 在台湾，如果死刑犯捐献器官，脑部中弹后20分钟即被判定法律上的死亡并摘取器官，这与医学共识不符。
- 台湾卫生福利部正在修改相关法规。
医学界和法学界的普遍共识：
- 自愿原则： 器官捐献必须基于完全自愿，且捐献者应充分知情。
- 脑死亡标准： 脑死亡的医学标准必须严格遵守，不得为了器官摘取而仓促进行。
- 伦理考量： 从死刑犯身上摘取器官存在伦理问题，特别是关于自愿性，以及可能成为国家认可的惩罚手段。
- 全球反对： 国际人权组织和移植医学界普遍反对从死刑犯身上摘取器官。
- 尊重人权： 无论犯下何种罪行，囚犯都应享有基本人权，包括身体自主权和死后的尊严。
- 透明度： 器官获取、分配和移植过程需要透明，以建立信任并防止腐败。
需要考虑的重点：
- 文本提到，台湾死刑犯器官捐献可能违反医学上对死亡的定义和现有的医学共识。
- 其他国家的讨论也强调了从囚犯身上摘取器官的伦理担忧。
- 关于死者是否有权捐献器官，还是应该由家人决定，存在争议，这可能会减少器官捐献的数量。
总而言之，共识是逐渐转向避免使用死刑犯器官，原因是其中涉及的伦理问题以及对透明、自愿系统的需求。
