政府不滅,人類無望

:spain: My message to Telegram users in Spain :red_exclamation_mark:

Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy:

  1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics.

:warning: Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse.

  1. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail.

:warning: Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo.

  1. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime.

:warning: Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda.

  1. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.”

:warning: Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition.

These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach.

:raised_fist: Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.

Last edited by @suen 2026-02-04T17:13:28Z

1 Like

有点极端但我能理解这种情绪…

不过“政府不灭=人类无望”我觉得更像是在说“权力结构不变,个体就一直被磨”。与其期待它灭,不如想想能不能在更小的尺度上把自己从某个环节里抽出来:信息源、关系、工作路径、甚至就是把注意力夺回来。

你这里说的“政府”更像是指现实的制度,还是一种抽象的“控制感”?