Are you listening to bots? Survey shows AI music is virtually undetectable

By Jaspreet Singh

November 12, 20253:33 AM PSTUpdated 3 hours ago

Nov 12 (Reuters) - A staggering 97% of listeners cannot distinguish between artificial intelligence-generated and human-composed songs, a Deezer–Ipsos survey showed on Wednesday, underscoring growing concerns that AI could upend how music is created, consumed and monetized.

The findings of the survey, for which Ipsos (ISOS.PA), opens new tab polled 9,000 participants across eight countries, including the U.S., Britain and France, highlight rising ethical concerns in the music industry as AI tools capable of generating songs raise copyright concerns and threaten the livelihoods of artists.

It also showed that most listeners want clear labelling on AI-generated music, music streaming platform Deezer (DEEZR.PA), opens new tab said.

The study found that 73% of respondents supported disclosure when AI-generated tracks are recommended, 45% sought filtering options, and 40% said they would skip AI-generated songs entirely. Around 71% expressed surprise at their inability to distinguish between human-made and synthetic tracks.

Deezer, which has 9.7 million subscribers, has seen daily AI music submissions rise to more than 50,000 — about a third of total uploads, up sharply from 18% in April. It has introduced tagging and excluded AI-produced tracks from editorial playlists and algorithmic recommendations to promote transparency.

“We believe strongly that creativity is generated by human beings, and they should be protected,” Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternier told Reuters, urging transparency.

Lanternier noted the complexity of implementing differential payout structures for AI music, stating a “massive change” in remuneration policies remains challenging. Deezer has also started excluding fake streams from royalty payments.

The issue gained attention earlier this year when AI band “The Velvet Sundown” attracted one million Spotify (SPOT.N), opens new tab listeners monthly before its synthetic origins were exposed.

Universal Music Group (UMG.AS), opens new tab recently settled a copyright case with AI music company Udio. While financial terms were undisclosed, the parties plan to launch an AI-powered music creation platform in 2026, using licensed music to train the tool.

On Tuesday, a Munich court ruled that OpenAI’s ChatGPT violated German copyright laws by reproducing song lyrics, a decision the company said it might appeal.

Consumer attitudes toward AI in media remain mixed. A May survey by Luminate found the majority of U.S. audiences were indifferent or accepting of AI use in cinema tasks like visual effects, but sceptical of AI-written scripts or synthetic actors.

Reporting by Jaspreet Singh in Bengaluru and Leo Marchandon in Gdansk; Editing by Nivedita Bhattacharjee, Saumyadeb Chakrabarty and Milla Nissi-Prussak

Last edited by @suen 2025-11-12T14:56:00Z

1 Like

转发:孙燕姿两年前说的话正在逐渐被验证。
作者:@耳帝
weibo.com/1344386244/Qdn…

最近AI改编歌曲在油管跟B站上非常火,把一首歌改编成R&B、灵魂、福音、爵士……掀起了类似于两年前的明星AI翻唱风潮,应该是Suno又进化了。

到了这个阶段,我是终于承认,AI可以做出很好听的音乐。B站上的什么大东北我的家,还有改编王菲的歌,好评一片,而外国人做得更好,油管上大量用魔城灵魂、大乐队爵士、当代R&B改编流行金曲的,说实话,真的很好听,我听了一个晚上,不知道怎么做到的,怎么能那么严丝合缝又那么freestyle,你明明知道甚至能听出是对经典的拼凑挪用,但就是很自然流畅很好听,可能是因为取材库都是那些最经典最伟大的音乐吧。

不夸张地说,你去油管上听听那些AI改编,吊打《歌手》95%上的改编不成问题。

AI歌曲创作现在也进化了,而且做出来的绝不像是两年前很土很low的那种歌,如今的AI音乐创作甚至很前卫新潮、很有音乐性,油管上有大量的做NJZ风格的Drum&Bass、Baltimore Club之类的音乐,很好听,做说唱的Beat更是能量产行业标准水平以上的产品。Spotify上有AI音乐人,月收听人数已经几百万了。我听下来,AI做的最好的就是电子音乐跟融合音乐,我猜测是因为前者本身就是数字化的产物,而后者的融合思路,AI本身就有巨大的融合素材库,做出的效果非常炫目缤纷。我听了好几天,觉得就目前AI的水平,放到2025年的乐坛,欧美的可能像Oklou、Rosalía、Dijon、Amaarae之类的AI可能做不出来,放到华语乐坛,可能万青、DOUDOU、苏运莹、苏紫旭、揽佬之类的AI做不出来,但再过几年呢,以这个趋势来说真的不好说,绝大多数歌手与音乐人我看都需要有些危机感,因为在技术层面上人是难以跟AI比的,而且越来越难比,你未来需要非常独特,或者交付出剖肝沥胆的真心。

AI演唱现在在蚪音也很火,我刷到有一个AI男声翻唱许茹芸的,点赞量巨高,甚至引发了一大堆真人唱将去挑战那个版本,但是唱的都不如AI版,因为AI版其实是违背人的生理结构的,比如在一个很高的音高上,正常人的嗓音构造是根本不可能有那么多的低频存在,但是AI轻易就能把这个缺失的频段的声音给加上,所以听起来比真人更“爽”,我油管刷到了一个AI唱摇滚的,AI做出来的高音F5、G5,我觉得Adam Lambert的质量也不过如此吧,因为听起来可能就是取材于Adam Lambert的嗓音,然后再加两个低档位的经典摇滚歌手的声音成分,那肯定声音密度更大,效果更骇人,似真人又更非人,像转音技巧什么的,对AI来说更是一种简单的排列组合,它更能复杂速率更快,在“声乐”层面上,AI能够轻松生产出真人苦练多年而不得的东西。

我不知道照这个速度发展下去,AI音乐未来还会变成什么样,两年前的时候,我会笃定地认为,人类创作是无法被AI取代的,比如说AI没有灵魂、真心与爱。更艺术的说法,可能会说,AI没有弱点、痛苦与恐惧,但是就目前来说,即使没有灵魂真心痛苦那些东西吧,我也不觉得比真人做得差或者难听,甚至有的更好听。照这速度发展下去,我预感,未来时代,只有金字塔顶端的天才艺术家可以跟AI对抗,由这极少数的天才肩负着“人类”创作的使命,而唱歌、创作这些东西,对于绝大多数普通人来说,可能纯粹就只作为一种个体的娱乐活动与精神需求,而不再具有消费品的意义。

我想起两年前,在AI孙燕姿翻唱在网上火了之后,孙燕姿发了一篇文章,她整体对于未来AI取代人类是持“悲观”态度的,她认为一个人再稀有,未来也能被“量身定制”。当时不少人觉得她有点杞人忧天了,比如文章里有句话写,有人说AI没有你的语感、情绪与呼吸,孙燕姿说,我怀疑AI掌握那些东西是迟早的事,人类无法超越它已指日可待。现在看,这就是进行时的事。歌手本人与艺术家,面对AI比普通人的危机感更重,前段时间欧美乐坛上千位音乐人联合签名抵制AI,他们面对AI似乎更有紧迫感,当然一是因为自己的利益难免受到威胁;二是因为,我猜测,艺术家本人,他们更知道,声音是如何在身体里生长又是如何迸发的,音乐是如何被制造出来的,他们对于音乐制作这件事,有着更加切身且真实的体会,有对技术是如何侵入艺术的最私密层面,有着非神秘化的祛魅,所以他们的预感与直觉,比大众的逻辑推理更敏感。

如今回头看孙燕姿两年前的那篇章文章,还是觉得很可贵,一是清醒,二是毫不自恋,她始终对时代变化与世界的未知保持敬畏,在未来变化与科技浪潮的面前,放弃自己是独一无二、无可替代的自恋的幻觉,这对于一位巨星来说太难得了。如果还有哪位歌手如今还觉得自己是独一无二的,那么可以思考,你作为一个歌手的“声音价值”能高过孙燕姿吗?如果连她都这么认为,那你还笃定自己不会被取代吗?如果你是一位歌手的粉丝,我建议可以去听听甚至亲自上手操作下Suno,看是否还有足够的信念,觉得自己追随信奉了世间的真理。可能在未来的时代,真的需要拥有孙燕姿所说的那种心态,“凡事皆有可能,凡事皆无所谓”,如果连她都无所谓,那我们绝大多数普通人也只是历史的尘埃,更需无所谓了。

1 Like

2 Likes