观点从来无所谓不同，而论据不应造假。你又不在高考考场上，自己查一下并无难度。而不至于对24元治疗眼睑发炎感到惊叹，也不至于为苏联并没有所谓月经警察感到放心。同时，观点逆天，是否也不甚好。在X上、xx日报上见到这种全为观点的文章本已正常。但号称要“广泛了解，十八岁后自主选择”的某位，或许不必总转发许许多多充满不实观点乃至非人观点的，文章。否则，你和xx日报天天叫着要学习xxx新时代xxxxxxx有何差别呢？ Last edited by @without_name 2025-01-01T05:07:38Z (UTC)

新闻学，

suen January 1, 2025, 7:19am 4

Here’s a breakdown of the thinking process to address the user’s questions about Lu Xun’s “In Memory of Miss Liu Hezhen”: Deconstruct the User’s Questions: The user poses two main questions: Did Lu Xun fabricate evidence in his essay about the March 18th Incident, based on the government’s official report? Did Lu Xun present an “outrageous” or “unconventional” perspective on the incident from the government’s point of view? Address the First Question (Fabrication of Evidence): Identif…

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled